ZeroX Network Whitepaper
  • 👋Welcome to ZeroX Network
  • 📖Overview
    • 💡Introduction
    • 🎮ZeroX Arcade
    • ✨ZeroX Network Explorer
  • 🪨Problems
    • 👁️‍🗨️Overview
    • 🗿Static Nature of Digital Assets
    • 📪Limited Use Cases
    • 🛸Lack of Interoperability
    • 🛠️Scalability and Efficiency Constraints
  • 💽Protocol
    • 👁️‍🗨️Overview
    • 👥Users
    • 💾Application Layer
    • 🕸️ZeroX Nodes
    • ⛓️Blockchain Layer
  • 🪙Tokenomics
    • 👁️‍🗨️Overview
  • 📜ERC-XXXX
    • 👁️‍🗨️Overview
    • 📀Specification
    • 🔼Update Module
    • 🗄️Event-Driven Mechanism
    • 📦Storage
  • 🛰️ZeroX Network
    • 👁️‍🗨️Overview
    • 🎡Utilities Management
    • 🎞️Status Synchronization
    • ⛓️Decentralized Network
    • ⚡Scalability and Efficiency
  • 🛸Applications
    • 👾Gaming
    • 👫Social
    • 🔮Other Apps
  • 🗺️Roadmap
    • 📆2024
  • 📚Miscellaneous
    • 📕Glossary
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Smart Contract-Driven Updates
  • Centralized Database/Server for Metadata
  • NFT Marketplaces Reflecting Metadata Update

Was this helpful?

  1. Problems

Static Nature of Digital Assets

PreviousOverviewNextLimited Use Cases

Last updated 1 year ago

Was this helpful?

Blockchain technology's hallmark of immutability grants it unparalleled security and trust by ensuring that ownership records are permanent and unalterable. This fundamental attribute solidifies the integrity of transactions across the blockchain, cementing its role as a cornerstone of digital trust and authenticity. However, the immutable nature of blockchain unfolds complexities when applied to the evolving landscape of digital asset metadata within dynamic digital ecosystems.

The application of blockchain to digital assets, particularly in their metadata, which details attributes and functionalities, reveals a nuanced challenge. Fields that thrive on innovation and interactivity, such as gaming, digital art, and social platforms, often require assets that can adapt and evolve over time. The traditional immutability of blockchain assets, though ensuring security, imposes constraints on these assets' flexibility and capacity to evolve, potentially stifling innovation in sectors that benefit from fluidity and adaptability.

Addressing this challenge, two primary methods have emerged, allowing for the update and evolution of digital asset metadata while navigating the constraints of blockchain immutability:

Smart Contract-Driven Updates

This method involves the collection owner or deployer initiating changes to the metadata's URI through smart contract functions. While this enables the metadata of digital assets to be updated, reflecting changes in attributes or functionalities, it centralizes control over these updates.

This method, though effective in keeping digital assets current, raises concerns about centralizing power in the hands of the collection owner, potentially deviating from blockchain's decentralized ethos.

Centralized Database/Server for Metadata

However, like the first method, it concentrates update control in the hands of the asset issuer, presenting similar centralization concerns.

These approaches, while addressing the need for digital asset flexibility and ensuring assets remain engaging and relevant, highlight a crucial tension within blockchain's application to digital assets: the balance between maintaining immutability for trust and security and allowing for the adaptability necessary in dynamic digital sectors. This balance is pivotal for the broader adoption and integration of blockchain technology, especially in areas eager to harness digital assets' full potential through continuous evolution and user interaction.

NFT Marketplaces Reflecting Metadata Update

In the current landscape of NFT marketplaces, OpenSea's approach to reflecting updates in NFT metadata lacks depth and transparency. While users can see when an NFT was last updated, this information is limited—it doesn't specify what was changed or how the asset has evolved. This system, primarily centralized, means that updates to an NFT's attributes are managed through mechanisms that are not visible or easily understood by non-technical users. Consequently, the actual history and evolution of an NFT's metadata become opaque, as most users are not adept at navigating blockchain explorers to uncover the full transactional history.

This gap highlights the need for a more decentralized approach to updating NFTs—one that ensures changes are transparent and traceable, providing users with a clear and comprehensive view of an NFT's history. Such an approach would democratize access to information, allowing all users, regardless of technical expertise, to understand the updates of an asset's attributes. It would offer a detailed, user-friendly history of an NFT's states, fostering greater trust and engagement in the dynamic digital assets market.

For instance, collections like have utilized this to refresh their asset metadata, demonstrating a centralized, albeit flexible, approach to asset management.

Alternatively, the metadata's URI can point to a centralized database or server under the collection owner's control, allowing for the metadata to be updated directly on the server without modifying the blockchain record. This method, employed by collections such as , offers flexibility in asset evolution without needing blockchain transaction updates.

🪨
🗿
Pudgy Penguin
method
Mutant Ape Yacht Club
Pudgy Penguin calls Set Base URI function to update tokens' metadata on Jul 25th, 2023
The Base URI of MAYC tokens is
OpenSea showing last updated time
OpenSea showing a token with immutable metadata
https://boredapeyachtclub.com/api/mutants/
https://opensea.io/assets/ethereum/0xbd3531da5cf5857e7cfaa92426877b022e612cf8/4787
https://opensea.io/assets/ethereum/0xbc4ca0eda7647a8ab7c2061c2e118a18a936f13d/5930